TOP 5 Teens in Court REACTING To LIFE SENTENCES

TOP 5 Teens in Court REACTING To LIFE SENTENCES

???? Subscribe and turn on all the notifications so you don't miss a video about Court Camera, Judge Moments and Law Clips.

Number 5. Seandell Jackson
Occasionally, a court room can become very dramatic when a sentence is read, but the reaction in this 2010 case, in which 19-year-old Seandell Jackson received his sentencing, is insane. Jackson was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide and robbery of 21-year-old University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee student, Nathan Potter. Jackson and 20-year-old Derek Thomas attempted to rob Potter, who was walking home to his apartment, and shot him. Potter wasn’t carrying any money.
Jackson showed no remorse or sorrow during the trial over the victim’s passing or his crime and even smiled at the victim’s family at one point when he was escorted out of the court room. Potter’s father, John Potter, addressed Judge Rebecca Dallet during the trial, saying: “Judge, there is nothing that can be said to bring back our Nathan,” but he asked for punishment to fit the horrific crime. He asked, “Is there such a thing as pure evil? We think so.” After being sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole, Jackson grew violent, cursing at the judge.

Number 4. Jennifer Mee
A Florida woman who became famous for her uncontrollable hiccupping was found guilty of first-degree and will serve life in prison without parole. A Pinellas County jury deliberated for four hours before delivering the verdict against 22-year-old Jennifer Mee. Mee wept in the Clearwater courtroom as the verdict was read. Minutes later, Judge Nancy Moate Ley explained that the only possible sentence for the charge was life in prison without the possibility of parole. The verdict and five-day trial was a sad end to a chapter in Mee’s short and sad life. Her attorneys said she suffered from schizophrenia and Tourette’s Syndrome, and a court psychiatrist said Mee’s intelligence was “low normal.”
As a 15-year-old, Mee developed a case of the hiccups that wouldn’t go away. She appeared on several TV shows and while on the Today show, was hugged by fellow guest and country music star Keith Urban. She tried home remedies and consulted medical specialists, a hypnotist and an acupuncturist, until the hiccups finally stopped on their own, though not for good. Her attorney, John Trevena, said his client was on medication to control the hiccupping, and even then, she occasionally had bouts.

Number 3. Raceland Martin
A Cumberland County teen who took the life of his grandfather with a hatchet two years ago could one day be freed from prison. Raistlin Martin, 17, pleaded guilty to first-degree for the Aug. 8, 2016 passing of 63-year-old Joseph Emmett Naulty. Superior Court Judge James Ammons sentenced him to life in prison with the possibility for parole after 25 years. Ammons had the option of allowing the opportunity for parole instead of handling down the mandatory life without parole sentence for first-degree because Martin was a juvenile when the crime happened. Prosecutors chose to try him in adult court, however.

#Courtcam #Judge #Criminal

???? Comment for a new video!
_________________________________________________________________

???? Prison Moments: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnaKiZnj8prq61bVq8WKYcNslet_Nh8Tz
???? Police Moments: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnaKiZnj8prqWllEtQzdpBc9tm5skD2ER
???? Court Cam: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnaKiZnj8prrkh2ADaDQQcjmNPObHBAOj

_________________________________________________________________
Court Moments
???? Videos about Crazy judges, Videos of Court Cam, Best Court Cam Moments
???? Subscribe now for more Aetv, Cops and True Crime Videos

_____________________________________________________
???? Copyright Questions, Contact and Business
• For copyright matters, business inquiries or other inquiries please contact us
at:Court.moments@gmail.com

⚠️ Disclaimers about Copyright!
RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” This video and our youtube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above